The duality of everything in this universe makes it more
intriguing and ofcourse more questionable. Nevertheless that calls for an
extensive and expansive research of inquisitive minds. The day we receive the
parenting crown, our natural curve for learning, observing and exploring gets a
new dimension. The “
Parents curve” or may be “Parents are the new kids on the block”
The child is the stimulator.
The reason for choosing up such a topic, few days ago I was
going through an article “How heredity and environment affect the
process of growth and development" Quite an interesting topic as I have
a 10 year old and each day I unleash new traits, unveil unique versatility in her character
as she grows, every day is a new day
till her growth gets the stagnation certificate but behavioural pattern or
development is an ever evolving saga which would be shaped by environment.
Environment, experience and training plays a vital role
apart from the genes inherited. My research was based on the findings that my
10 year old was not inclined towards music at all but her genes had musical
hypersensitivity. We have enrolled her to music classes as she has the right
pitch and her humming spoke of melody or may be an ardent ambition of musically
inclined parents....whatever ;) The training starts, The “Nurture” story begins
here. The battle between the “Nature and
Nurture”
Now coming to the
topic- I was transported to the very popular concept - the variance in thoughts
between exponents of the two schools- The
behavioural approach and the genetic research module “Nature vs. Nurture. Nature is hormone based behaviour. Nurture is the
way the child is brought up, it is the sum total of environment and experience.
We as parents not always have an understanding of the terms
scientifically but our perception, our scattered knowledge and natural
understanding often put these theories in conventional frame through which it
is easier to draw a conclusion.
The physical attributes of the child is such a trait which
we naturally attach to our genes...me and my husband literally have done a
microscopic survey on heights. Maternal grandparents to paternal great
grandparents the list has been long ;) It’s not necessary to a have a finely
wired knowledge of genetics to observe the common place events which naturally
point out the impact of genes. Height, eye colour, the muscle contour, athletic
genes, jubilant personalities, multiple personality, intelligentsia, slow
learners and even psychopath’s all have genes as contributor.
Nurture or environment has its own glory-My daughter has an exercise schedule everyday as we believe that her height might escape the wrath of genes with a bit of muscle push and pulls, that is where the “nurture “ aspect assimilates.
Modern day behavioural psychologist opines that nurturing
plays a vital role in the overall personality development of a child. Here the
genetic or the hereditary concept is not always considered as vital to human
development. I have a common friend who was blessed with twins, both grew up to
be similar in many traits but there were a few significant traits which were
gradually being visible in one of the child, she was more of an extrovert in
character, the other one would shy away in a crowd, there was also a stunning
inclination towards music in one of the child but the other one had an athletic
aptitude. The musical trait is definitely an endowment from her mom who herself
is a trained singer, but sports was the last thing to be in their basket not
even in remotest family lineage showed any inclination...her husband being a
doc, had his last high jump session in one of his annual school sports
event, the very complexity lies here.
Controversies, research and analysis propound this subject,
Nature vs. Nurture. During early years philosopher Immanuel Kant explained that
human cognition is an out spur of genetics and heredity but on the contrast
philosopher Locke believed human mind is just like a sheet of blank paper,
nurturing, training and the overall environment shapes, outlines the human
mind.
The research continues and we as parents with our own trial
and error methods measure the impact of
genes by analysing our forefather’s in
one hand and on the other hand simultaneously compile, create and nurture the left over with the best of our
abilities, creating a perfect blend of “Nature
and Nurture”
Image C@Google
Image C@Google
Deepak Chopra's latest theory - we can change our genes with practice, healthy eating and exercise. All can be changed except a few - the ones that cause cancer or rare diseases. If you look carefully at it, then NURTURE becomes the more dominant factor.
ReplyDeleteThanks Saru! Yes believe so a bit of nurturing plays a vital role.
ReplyDeleteControversies, research and analysis propound this subject, Nature vs. Nurture. During early years philosopher Immanuel Kant explained that human cognition is an out spur of genetics and heredity but on the contrast philosopher Locke believed human mind is just like a sheet of blank paper, nurturing, training and the overall environment shapes, outlines the human mind phd dissertation writing service
ReplyDelete